Moondream 3.1 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Moondream 3.1 is 1.2× cheaper at a typical mix of 3 input tokens per output token.
- Qwen3.6 27B accepts longer prompts: 262K vs 32K tokens.
- Qwen3.6 27B's best provider was more reliable over 24 h: 99.92% vs 98.1%.
- Moondream 3.1 is the newer model (released 2026-10-15).
| Moondream 3.1 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Moondream | Qwen |
| Released | 2026-10-15 | 2026-04-27 |
| Input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.45 |
| Output / 1M | $2.50 | $2.70 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $0.85 | $1.01 |
| Context | 32K | 262K |
| Max output | 4K | 66K |
| Accepts | text, image | text, image, video |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 1 | 7 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $2.50 | $2.00 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 98.1% | 99.92% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | — | Operational |
Cost calculator
Moondream 3.1
$55.50 per month$1.85 per day
Qwen3.6 27B
$67.50 per month$2.25 per day
Moondream 3.1 saves $12.00 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Moondream 3.1 with