inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Ling 3.0 Flash is 1.7× cheaper at a typical mix of 3 input tokens per output token.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts longer prompts: 1M vs 262K tokens.
| Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | inclusionAI | Qwen |
| Released | 2026-07-23 | 2026-07-27 |
| Input / 1M | $0.021 | $0.03 |
| Output / 1M | $0.063 | $0.13 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0042 | $0.0060 |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $0.032 | $0.055 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Accepts | text | text, image, video |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 2 | 2 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $0.063 | $0.13 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 99.86% | 100% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | — | Operational |
Cost calculator
Ling 3.0 Flash
$2.21 per month$0.07 per day
Qwen3.7 Flash
$3.75 per month$0.13 per day
Ling 3.0 Flash saves $1.55 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Ling 3.0 Flash with
Compare Qwen3.7 Flash with