Mistral Saba vs undi95 ReMM SLERP 13B
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Saba is 1.4× cheaper at a typical mix of 3 input tokens per output token.
- Saba accepts longer prompts: 33K vs 6K tokens.
- Saba is the newer model (released 2025-02-17).
| Saba | ReMM SLERP 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Mistral | undi95 |
| Released | 2025-02-17 | 2023-07-22 |
| Input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.35 |
| Output / 1M | $0.60 | $0.65 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.02 | — |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $0.30 | $0.425 |
| Context | 33K | 6K |
| Max output | 26K | 6K |
| Accepts | text, file | text |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 3 | 1 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $0.60 | $0.65 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 100% | 100% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | Operational | — |
Cost calculator
Saba
$21.00 per month$0.70 per day
ReMM SLERP 13B
$30.75 per month$1.02 per day
Saba saves $9.75 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Saba with