Relace Search vs unbiased Pareto 26.10
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Both cost about the same at a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
- Pareto 26.10 accepts longer prompts: 1M vs 256K tokens.
- Relace Search's best provider was more reliable over 24 h: 100% vs 99.42%.
- Pareto 26.10 is the newer model (released 2026-10-15).
| Relace Search | Pareto 26.10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Relace | unbiased |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2026-10-15 |
| Input / 1M | $1.00 | $0.80 |
| Output / 1M | $3.00 | $3.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.03 |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $1.50 | $1.40 |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Accepts | text | text, image |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 1 | 1 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $3.00 | $3.20 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 100% | 99.42% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | — | — |
Cost calculator
Relace Search
$105 per month$3.50 per day
Pareto 26.10
$96.00 per month$3.20 per day
Pareto 26.10 saves $9.00 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Relace Search with