Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Relace Apply 3
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is 2.8× cheaper at a typical mix of 3 input tokens per output token.
- Both accept prompts up to 256K tokens.
| Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Relace Apply 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Qwen | Relace |
| Released | 2025-09-11 | 2025-09-26 |
| Input / 1M | $0.09 | $0.85 |
| Output / 1M | $1.10 | $1.25 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $0.343 | $0.95 |
| Context | 262K | 256K |
| Max output | 16K | 128K |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 4 | 1 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $1.10 | $1.25 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 100% | 100% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | Operational | — |
Cost calculator
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
$21.90 per month$0.73 per day
Relace Apply 3
$69.75 per month$2.33 per day
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct saves $47.85 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct with
Compare Relace Apply 3 with