Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 vs Meta Muse Wonder
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Muse Wonder is 1.3× cheaper at a typical mix of 3 input tokens per output token.
- Both accept prompts up to 1M tokens.
- Muse Wonder is the newer model (released 2026-10-12).
| Claude Opus 4.6 | Muse Wonder | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Meta |
| Released | 2026-02-04 | 2026-10-12 |
| Input / 1M | $5.00 | $4.00 |
| Output / 1M | $25.00 | $20.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.20 |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $10.00 | $8.00 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 944K |
| Accepts | text, image, file | text, image, file, audio, video |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 6 | 1 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $25.00 | $20.00 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 100% | 100% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | Operational | — |
Cost calculator
Claude Opus 4.6
$675 per month$22.50 per day
Muse Wonder
$540 per month$18.00 per day
Muse Wonder saves $135 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Claude Opus 4.6 with