Qwen3.6 Plus vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Qwen3.6 Plus is 1.1× cheaper at a typical mix of 3 input tokens per output token.
- Both accept prompts up to 1M tokens.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro output costs $0.609 per 1M via GMICloud, against the list price of $1.80.
- Qwen3.6 Plus's best provider was more reliable over 24 h: 99.93% vs 95.1%.
| Qwen3.6 Plus | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Qwen | Xiaomi |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-22 |
| Input / 1M | $0.325 | $0.48 |
| Output / 1M | $1.95 | $1.80 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.096 |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $0.731 | $0.81 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 236K |
| Accepts | text, image, video | text |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 1 | 3 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $1.95 | $0.609 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 99.93% | 95.1% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | Operational | — |
Cost calculator
Qwen3.6 Plus
$48.75 per month$1.63 per day
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$55.80 per month$1.86 per day
Qwen3.6 Plus saves $7.05 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Qwen3.6 Plus with
Compare MiMo-V2.5-Pro with