Qwen-Plus vs Sao10K Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Qwen-Plus is 2.2× cheaper at a typical mix of 3 input tokens per output token.
- Qwen-Plus accepts longer prompts: 1M vs 131K tokens.
- Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2's best provider was more reliable over 24 h: 99.78% vs 96.6%.
- Qwen-Plus is the newer model (released 2025-02-01).
| Qwen-Plus | Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Qwen | Sao10K |
| Released | 2025-02-01 | 2024-08-28 |
| Input / 1M | $0.26 | $0.85 |
| Output / 1M | $0.78 | $0.85 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.052 | — |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $0.39 | $0.85 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 1 | 1 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $0.78 | $0.85 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 96.6% | 99.78% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | Operational | — |
Cost calculator
Qwen-Plus
$27.30 per month$0.91 per day
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
$63.75 per month$2.13 per day
Qwen-Plus saves $36.45 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Qwen-Plus with
Compare Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 with