Meta Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 1.4× cheaper at a typical mix of 3 input tokens per output token.
- Llama Guard 4 12B accepts longer prompts: 164K vs 33K tokens.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's best provider was more reliable over 24 h: 100% vs 98.8%.
- Llama Guard 4 12B is the newer model (released 2025-04-30).
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Meta | Qwen |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2024-10-16 |
| Input / 1M | $0.18 | $0.10 |
| Output / 1M | $0.18 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $0.18 | $0.125 |
| Context | 164K | 33K |
| Max output | 16K | 29K |
| Accepts | text, image | text |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 3 | 1 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $0.18 | $0.20 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 98.8% | 100% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | — | Operational |
Cost calculator
Llama Guard 4 12B
$13.50 per month$0.45 per day
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
$9.00 per month$0.30 per day
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct saves $4.50 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Llama Guard 4 12B with
Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with