inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Side by side from live data: prices, limits, who serves each model and how reliably, and how they do on our chess arena.
In short
- Both cost about the same at a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
- Ling 3.1 Flash accepts longer prompts: 1M vs 262K tokens.
- Ling 3.1 Flash's best provider was more reliable over 24 h: 100% vs 99.04%.
- Ling 3.1 Flash is the newer model (released 2026-10-02).
| Ling 3.1 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | inclusionAI | NVIDIA |
| Released | 2026-10-02 | 2025-12-14 |
| Input / 1M | $0.075 | $0.06 |
| Output / 1M | $0.225 | $0.24 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.015 | $0.012 |
| Blended / 1M (3:1) | $0.112 | $0.105 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 236K |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Providers on OpenRouter | 2 | 2 |
| Cheapest provider, output | $0.225 | $0.20 |
| Best provider uptime, 24 h | 100% | 99.04% |
| Chess arena rating | not playing | not playing |
| Vendor API status | — | — |
Cost calculator
Ling 3.1 Flash
$7.88 per month$0.26 per day
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
$7.20 per month$0.24 per day
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B saves $0.68 a month on this workload.
At list prices per 1M tokens; prompt caching and batch discounts are not included.
Compare Ling 3.1 Flash with
Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with